firetools wrote:Gen Iv, as far as new pokemon go, was sloppy with half, and great with the other half (But it made up for it with the awesome new battle mechanics, and New dimensions, as well as some new awesome Evo's to old pokemon)
I personally felt that Gen V was just lazy. I mean, sure the 3d-ness was cool, but the new pokemon werent that awesome( Seriously?!?! Ice cream and trash????) And It really didnt introduce anything new (although it made multiplayer awesome) I just feel as if in everything new they made they half did it.
P.S. Karry I would <3 you forever if you did the Lux line
haha, i will try to hold back my rage at what i just read.
there are sooo many amazing pokemon in this gen, the only ones that ANYONE ever use in the argument against it are those same two pokemon. great, that's two bad pokemon out of a whole generation of awesome. they seem to leave out the epic ones that this gen has introduced like zoroark, archen, excadrill, hydreigon, scraggy, the starters, braviary, mandibuzz, joltik, galvantula, yamask, chandelure my god the list goes on.
i can't say the same for the first couple gens, they were nothing but crap and their games weren't memorable at all. (the remakes of gold and silver were wonderful, but those don't count for these gens, only 4th)
i'd say this gen was by FAR the most creative in terms of design and concept. and the games were stunningly beautiful for a ds game. it also introduced a TON of new features, like triple and rotation battles which are surprisingly a lot of fun to take part in! there are tons more features, but i'll let you search them up yerself, bulbapedia is a great source to look at.
but calling this gen sloppy utterly burns me to the very core because it is so far from the truth.
in other news, i would gladly take on the lux line!