Model Rater, Pixelmon Tester, Official Forum Supporter, Gym Development Member!
Not the Pokemon we need, but the one we deserve.
I mean, I for my perspective is well reduced polygons, so I cant really tell how low this have to be, as for the shape, it looks like chansey yes, well I'll see what i can do :S
Edited: I also did read the rules and tried my best to keep it low (else these would be more hi-quality for designe xD) , the thing is... it is like if they arent even sure what should the amount needs to be for these polygons :S
this chansey only owns 516 faces , thats 492 vertices, in tris: 968 , what are we using here? ><
Its easier to just make a generalization and say "make it as low as possible WITHOUT ruining its appearance too much." Because there will be massive poly differences between small and large Pokemon.
EDIT: Yes, it looks good. My final recommendation? Wait. Patience. Keep it how it is unless told otherwise by the developers. I have helped you all that I can. The developers are busy as far as I know, and even if they aren't, it is safe to assume they are.
Model Rater, Pixelmon Tester, Official Forum Supporter, Gym Development Member!
Not the Pokemon we need, but the one we deserve.
"Sorry poklaying dota2." -Zeecount 2014